We are at a stage where we need to become representative of content owners in order to further progress with payment companies, web hosting companies, card associations and law enforcement.

We have already made extraordinary progress in shutting down commercial piracy with file lockers but now we're going to widen our efforts. In order to be most effective at mitigating piracy in all it's forms we need to become representative of rights holders.

IP Rights Holders can now become represented by Copy Control so we can help you mitigate piracy of your content.

Representation by Copy Control is not a replacement for your current DMCA arrangements, rather it's complimentary to them.

What we do is actively enforce your rights by working with web hosting companies, payment processing companies, banks, card associations, advertising networks and other service providers to have them stop working with the pirates and their sites.

Where organisations are un-cooperative we have a number of legal strategies that we employ to gain compliance.

We also liaise with law enforcement agencies and other government agencies to mitigate piracy on your behalf.

To get your company , brand or content represented by Copy Control we ask that you fill out this simple form.

http://copycontrol.org/get-represented/

once you fill out this form I will send you a copy of our rights-holder representation agreement for you to sign and return back to us.

you can also read about what representation will do for you at

http://copycontrol.org/services/

We work on a cost recovery basis so the fees for representation are quite low and if you can't afford them we'll work with you to come up with a fee which suits your budget. Small rights holders would pay around $500 per year (or $50 per month), Mid sized rights holder companies would pay around $1000 per year (or $100 per month) and large rights holders would pay around $3500 per year or ($350 per month).

This is very expensive and labor intensive work, we need to charge fees to recover the costs of what we are doing.

Representation is non exclusive. Becoming represented by Copy Control should not impact any other relationships you have with DMCA agents, legal services, attorneys or investigators. We are a complimentary service to all of these types of organisations.

If you have any questions about becoming represented by us please email me at members -at- copycontrol.org

Why would you want to do that? If he is dealing in stolen CC and such, turn the information over to the authorities and let them take care of him.

Looks like a jr Kim Dotcom :1orglaugh

Looks like the best piracy business of the moment is Tube sites. Image sitws/file lockers/everything else is on radar but tube sites are still raking in $
We gonna see lots more tubes run ny noobes

We're uncovering more infringing sites owned by Simon Leht, for example vbgm-links.com
topboard.org vbgm-boards.com

Congrats on making this very important new step :thumbsup

Dear fellow rights holders, please consider joining and signing representation agreement with Copycontrol asap. Regular funding provided by you (which is quite affordable in terms of fees), representation agreements and copies of your DMCAs will allow Copycontrol to take this fight on the whole new level - to kill whatever is left of file lockers and start dealing with other forms of commercial piracy in an equally fast and efficient manner.

P.S. FerroCash is already officially represented by Copycontrol :pimp It takes 10 minutes of your time to get all necessary papers from Copycontrol, to sign them and to send them back.

Well as a cam site I am not an IP or right holder, instead I am one advertiser who is puzzled about the fact my competitor's popunders , IM ads, banners etc. appear at every file locker or pirate forum page I know of (plus tubes with 1 hour long videos).
I could just say this is unfair competition by other cam sites who buy traffic there, in the case I decide not to advertise in "bad place". I have evidence that most it is pre-paid spots they deal and pay directly, not accidental broker traffic.
At the moment, there is no risk whatsoever in advertising pi piratebay or kim dotcom pages, that I know of.. just some ad networks was asked to stop, but not the final advertisers, which is who really paid there.
So a cam site (or gambling or whatever site), sure will buy ads on pirate sites, why should not, for go in heaven rather than in hell, after they're dead?
The fact is, I used broker traffic in past (those skimmed/popunder who include 1000's of domain names who link each other), buying "all us,ca,au,uk" traffic from all network... it was for tubecamgirl.com which is a cam site of modern "free/mfc/tube" way... then went to check (via http referrers grouping) where sales was from and, I could verify I got good sales from... let me see what this site is... well some full dvdrip sites!
Yes I can say that traffic on pirate sites converts same (or more) than one of 5 min "legal tubes" or blogs or old style tgp, at least for cams, and I suppose same good it is for gambling and the such.
So until it will be de facto safe to buy massively ad space from pirate sites (= forums and blogs with links to dvdrip in filelockers with previews on imagehosts - plus on tubes with 1 hour long videos who not reply to DMCA's), I am 101% sure that *everyone* will advertise there and even pay big because bidding with others, all eager to buy ads.

Great work guys!

Bumping for CopyControl and just general thanks to AK and Stop File Lockers.

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1089055

If you've previously contributed to the Stop File Lockers campaign, please contact me at members -at- copycontrol.org

Bump to page one...

Just bumping to keep this where it should be

For that hair alone, well and the shot in the suit holding his chin like some cheap stock photography from istock he deserves everything coming to him!

Don't worry this merry band of thieves will get everything coming to them in spades.

Copy that.

Don't let dreamboat's good looks fool you for one second. This motherfucker with the smokey eyes is a long time documented thief, well exposed here.

This was discussed with LeaseWeb and they pulled the plug on them. Problem is they moved to camaelhost within 24 hours :upsidedow

Just needed to wait for DNS to update. :disgust

Hosting companies taking on these storage haven is equivalent to a company like Avangate taking on pirates. They know it's wrong but
there is a lot of money there if you're willing to do it.

A sad state of affairs. Hopefully this will change over time. :2 cents:

Piracy over the past month according to DMCA notices filed on Google paints an interesting picture.

http://stopfilelockers.com/wp-conten...fringments.jpg

where is the kaktuz thread?

Oh wow..

Eric, inside for a moment please. Why are you covering for pirates?
 

Curious why you deleted public info and public photos in my post after I outed one of the biggest pirates in the pirate world, S-i-m-o-n K-e-y.

I did everything within the rules for GFY, every name listed is involved deeply in serious piracy, and now you're covering for this shit bag pirate and even removed his name from the post. What gives man? Is that the mystery owner who has been hiding behind your corporate front man all this time?

Only two names get removed from this board, one of them is the old Mansef owner, and the other is this guy.

Don't bother..

http://www.bangitout.com/uploads/12jew-jitsu.jpg

So you can't start a thread?

I've got a couple on the go, we don't want to get greedy.

But no thread about Kaktuz? I was looking forward to that one.

I wonder what is his legal name? Are the addresses provided legit?

Isn't it illegal to provide fictitious whois info? Can't you lose domains if you provide bad info?

Looks like he owns http://adyea.com/ also - dont think i saw that in your list

This is more than one person involved.

It's not illegal per se to enter false whois information however if you are committing a crime, as we allege these people are, then it's an aggravating factor. It's certainly a violation of ICANN policies.

kaktuzx also owns

http://www.gayheaven.org/

I took it as Simon Leht / Simon Vega / Simon Key are the same person using different names.

One thing I noticed. Although all of my domains have registration privacy, if you do an ip look up, all my info is displayed just like whois info. I assume this info comes from my host rather than registrar.

IP Privacy isn't really that private, when you serve a subpoena on a registrar they cough up the information really quick.

I only post information that has been publicly available in this thread and on StopFileLockers.com - we have a order of magnitude more information on our targets than we ever post.

edit****

It can all go on the Stop File Lockers site.

It's also recorded over here for posterity.

Don't you think this is going a little overboard? One thing is fighting the business and another is to post private information of people on public forums. This is wrong on so many levels, not to mention that whoever that Simon person is, he's not the only one in the photos.

If you do this, may be you should post your own pictures and family pictures up and complete them with your home address and do the same for your employees, donors and whoever else is involved. That would only be fare. You have turned your activity into a business and if you have nothing to hide or not afraid of anything, go ahead post that info up.

I think you guys as a community should investigate why moderators did what they did, but that has to be done privately. Is this Simon person their friend? Did he pay them? Did he send a legal notice? Those questions should be answered.

Right now it looks like double standards. I remember when people allegedly tracked down info about one of the largest file host being owned by GFY owners all that was quickly, folks got banned or blocked out.

P.S. This is my first post, hope it's not going to be last.

Just out of interest, which piracy outfit, file locker, or other targeted site are you involved with ?

This thread turned out to be shit. :321GFY good job AK

We haven't even started yet.

Well the direction it took isn't the right one.