GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Killing off File Lockers (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1072777)

RegUser 11-02-2012 12:10 PM

Wjat is there left to save?
The 1000s of tube sites are full of millions of free videos with thousands of frsh videos being added every day.
Piracy is not only alive but thriving

dgraves 11-02-2012 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RegUser (Post 19291079)
Wjat is there left to save?
The 1000s of tube sites are full of millions of free videos with thousands of frsh videos being added every day.
Piracy is not only alive but thriving

There's still plenty of money to be made in porn. It's not like the thieves have a great business model. They're unethical to begin with so most of those sites are full of pop-ups, pop-unders, floating ads, viruses, malware, spam, etc. which piss a lot of people off. It's obvious that they have to force products down the surfer's throats. I see that as a sign of desperation.

I talked about this on my member's area forum and many of my members admit finding my site from tubes and file sharing sites. They joined my site because of the issues I mentioned above.

I believe many of those sites will eventually destroy themselves.

Paul Markham 11-02-2012 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RegUser (Post 19291079)
Wjat is there left to save?
The 1000s of tube sites are full of millions of free videos with thousands of frsh videos being added every day.
Piracy is not only alive but thriving

True. but it will please the Film, music, programming, Games industries. When they pick up this fight with their money. It will get 10 times better than what AK is doing.

vollenweider 11-02-2012 01:40 PM

Hello AdultKing,
I am Simon, we have had few conversation over icq but its been for a while since last time i saw you online so i bet i am on your shit list. Since this is a public forum, i would like to state what i had discussed with you previously regarding piracy.

I remember you saying the main goal of your project is to fight against piracy, and you have targeted the file lockers first for your reasons which i don't even care about. Reading some of the comments in this topic makes me believe that your job is effective while some of them aren't that much clear. If you remember, my question was that why don't you go after torrent sites at the same time since they are worse than file hosting sites offering FREE access to all the materials. A simple example is the following website:

rarbg.com/torrents.php?category=4

I can guarantee that you can find every single porn video/movie released on this site for free. The interesting point here is you denying to get involved with torrent websites where the amount of illegal material is simply uncountable while we see you saying that your main goal is "Fighting against the sharing of pirated and illegal content".

So lets go back to the original question, do you believe only file lockers are the headache and responsible for piracy or should we take a look at torrents too?

Thanks

dgraves 11-02-2012 02:52 PM

I'm getting ready to send out a DMCA to RapidShare and was wondering if anyone had the best email addresses for Visa, Master Card and American Express so I can cc them as well.

johnnyloadproductions 11-02-2012 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dgraves (Post 19291326)
I'm getting ready to send out a DMCA to RapidShare and was wondering if anyone had the best email addresses for Visa, Master Card and American Express so I can cc them as well.

Rapidshare seems to let several things linger on their servers for a very long time.

dgraves 11-02-2012 03:26 PM

I've noticed that as well and that's why I like to "cc" everyone in the chain.

6South 11-02-2012 03:41 PM

I said "prosecutions", not "investigations". I can fill out a web form and get an investigation number from ICE. How many actual prosecutions has your system generated?

I've been an information architect designing secure content systems for governments and military clients for well over a decade. I promise you there are existing DRM technologies that do work and defeat all capture methods even videotaping a monitor if it comes to that.

The hold up on wide spread use has been a combination of limitations imposed by classified status and the need for computer hardware to cycle through the market. The older versions of this are becoming available outside of military and government markets now but even those beat anything you've seen in the commercial sphere by miles. Nothing has prevented the entertainment industry from developing the same capabilities other than misinformation and an industry mind set based on outdated methods. (Like spending millions to buy lawmakers vs. developing other solutions).

There are plenty of alternate payment methods already popular w/ the piracy crowd and there will be more. The conversion to spendable cash is easy and they can obtain everything they need including servers without ever needing a credit card.

Keep up the good work though, someone needs to do it and I do applaud the change in tactics to going after the payment processor accounts. I completely disagree that it solves everything, however.

I stand by my position that while it's necessary to keep the small fish under control the big players such as the organized crime rings will only grow stronger. You won't change the law enforcement picture in some of those places for at least another 10-20 years if that soon.

dgraves 11-02-2012 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6South (Post 19291423)
I promise you there are existing DRM technologies that do work and defeat all capture methods even videotaping a monitor if it comes to that.

Is that technology available?

AdultKing 11-02-2012 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6South (Post 19291423)
I said "prosecutions", not "investigations". I can fill out a web form and get an investigation number from ICE. How many actual prosecutions has your system generated?

You keep talking about ICE, FBI completely ignoring that fact that these are not the only federal law enforcement bodies in existence on this planet. We are working closely with several national government law enforcement bodies and I am confident that prosecutions shall be brought against individuals and companies.

Quote:

I've been an information architect designing secure content systems for governments and military clients for well over a decade. I promise you there are existing DRM technologies that do work and defeat all capture methods even videotaping a monitor if it comes to that.
At what cost and disadvantage to the consumer ?

Quote:

The hold up on wide spread use has been a combination of limitations imposed by classified status and the need for computer hardware to cycle through the market. The older versions of this are becoming available outside of military and government markets now but even those beat anything you've seen in the commercial sphere by miles. Nothing has prevented the entertainment industry from developing the same capabilities other than misinformation and an industry mind set based on outdated methods. (Like spending millions to buy lawmakers vs. developing other solutions).
I've heard the spending millions to buy lawmakers argument from the piracy sector, you have <40 posts, nobody knows you, no credentials, we don't know who you are so what you're saying is without any credibility until you back up your self professed credentials.

There are many additional issues in relation to enforcement of IP that go way outside the scope of DRM. Passing off, misuse of brands, misuse of trademarks are just a few, how does DRM solve these ? It doesn't.

I believe that the best way to hurt the pirates is by prosecuting them and taking their money, internet connectivity and monetization methods away - disincentivise them.


Quote:

There are plenty of alternate payment methods already popular w/ the piracy crowd and there will be more. The conversion to spendable cash is easy and they can obtain everything they need including servers without ever needing a credit card.
Name them.

There are 3rd party processors acting way outside Visa and Mastercard regulations and we will be dealing with them. There are 3rd party processors acting outside applicable laws in the countries in which they operate, we'll be dealing with them too. For the others we will be working to cut off the ability to transact across different payment methods.

Quote:

Keep up the good work though, someone needs to do it and I do applaud the change in tactics to going after the payment processor accounts. I completely disagree that it solves everything, however.
As I have already stated we have other strategies ready to play out, we're not going to announce them here, you'll have to watch and see.

Quote:

I stand by my position that while it's necessary to keep the small fish under control the big players such as the organized crime rings will only grow stronger. You won't change the law enforcement picture in some of those places for at least another 10-20 years if that soon.
I think you underestimate the ability of existing legislation to curb these activities on a global scale, until now few have been prepared to leverage all of the available attack vectors against piracy - we intend to change all of that and thus far we've been pretty successful.

Nautilus 11-02-2012 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dgraves (Post 19291326)
I'm getting ready to send out a DMCA to RapidShare and was wondering if anyone had the best email addresses for Visa, Master Card and American Express so I can cc them as well.

No VISA please for this one, for all hosts that are still using Paypal, send DMCAs to infringementreport(at)paypal.com. Or better yet use Paypal's own pdf form to submit your infringement report, they tend to pay more attention to reports submitted using their own form, it can be found here:

https://cms.paypal.com/is/cgi-bin/?c...gementRpt_full

Please ONLY cc your DMCAs to infringements(at)copycontrol.org - AK will cc them to all other relevant third parties including the ones mentioned by you in a weekly report. More cc-s will achieve nothing but to annoy them. It is a general rule to select only ONE third party service provider to send your DMCA to, the one that is getting targetted and where the chances of success are the biggest. When you cc it to several third parties someone will get on it faster and the others will get annoyed that you're sending them dead links. You need to select only one and to let them handle removals from start to finish. Let AK to handle the cc-ing part and making all other 3rd parties involved aware that their service is being used for infringement. Take one and make them fully responsible for processing of your take down request. In case of Rapidshare, that is Paypal.

Some of the hosts that are still using Paypal: Rapidshare.com, Hotfile.com, Crocko.com, Slingfile.com, Fileflyer.com, Speedyshare.com. Whenever you have links for any of them, or any other hosts that are using Paypal, send DMCAs to infringementreport(at)paypal.com (and cc them to infringements(at)copycontrol.org of course).

dgraves 11-02-2012 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nautilus (Post 19291486)
No VISA please for this one, for all hosts that are still using Paypal, send DMCAs to infringementreport(at)paypal.com. Or better yet use Paypal's own pdf form to submit your infringement report, they tend to pay more attention to reports submitted using their own form, it can be found here:

https://cms.paypal.com/is/cgi-bin/?c...gementRpt_full

Please ONLY cc your DMCAs to infringements(at)copycontrol.org - AK will cc them to all other relevant third parties including the ones mentioned by you in a weekly report. More cc-s will achieve nothing but to annoy them. It is a general rule to select only ONE third party service provider to send your DMCA to, the one that is getting targetted and where the chances of success are the biggest. When you cc it to several third parties someone will get on it faster and the others will get annoyed that you're sending them dead links. You need to select only one and to let them handle removals from start to finish. Let AK to handle the cc-ing part and making all other 3rd parties involved aware that their service is being used for infringement. Take one and make them fully responsible for processing of your take down request. In case of Rapidshare, that is Paypal.

Some of the hosts that are still using Paypal: Rapidshare.com, Hotfile.com, Crocko.com, Slingfile.com, Fileflyer.com, Speedyshare.com. Whenever you have links for any of them, or any other hosts that are using Paypal, send DMCAs to infringementreport(at)paypal.com (and cc them to infringements(at)copycontrol.org of course).

The last time I cc'd PayPal on a DMCA, they cancelled all my accounts. I guess that's one way of dealing with DMCA. After all, who's making them more money?

Nautilus 11-02-2012 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dgraves (Post 19291509)
The last time I cc'd PayPal on a DMCA, they cancelled all my accounts. I guess that's one way of dealing with DMCA. After all, who's making them more money?

I'm not sure what you're talking about.

halfpint 11-02-2012 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nautilus (Post 19291486)
No VISA please for this one

Why dont you want DMCA's sent to Visa ? Thats where I would send it if it were me dealing with RapidShare Once they loose Visa they would be pretty much fucked

dgraves 11-02-2012 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nautilus (Post 19291515)
I'm not sure what you're talking about.

I cc'd PayPal on a DMCA that I sent out and a few days later I got a reply letting me know my accounts have been "Limited" which basically means I couldn't use them. They didn't give me a specific reason, just a list of a million possibilities for the "Limit".

When I disputed it, they said my account was tied to adult sites. I don't use PayPal to sell porn so I drew my own conclusion. It was the old school "I'll give you something to complain about" method.

dgraves 11-02-2012 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpint (Post 19291541)
Why dont you want DMCA's sent to Visa ? Thats where I would send it if it were me dealing with RapidShare Once they loose Visa they would be pretty much fucked

Good question. I saw PayPal, VISA, Master Card and America Express listed as processors. Does VISA get a pass on this one?

Triple-A 11-02-2012 04:53 PM

http://www.debrauw.com/News/LegalAle...tober2012.aspx

interesting link for those hosting in Holland the shitty companies and filelockers...
maybe worth showing this link where necessary!

Nautilus 11-02-2012 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dgraves (Post 19291559)
I cc'd PayPal on a DMCA that I sent out and a few days later I got a reply letting me know my accounts have been "Limited" which basically means I couldn't use them. They didn't give me a specific reason, just a list of a million possibilities for the "Limit".

When I disputed it, they said my account was tied to adult sites. I don't use PayPal to sell porn so I drew my own conclusion. It was the old school "I'll give you something to complain about" method.

I understand your frustration, however, here is the reality - DMCAing VISA for hosts that are using Paypal is pointless. VISA is not going to disconnect Paypal because of your DMCA, or because of a million of DMCAs for that matter, they're too big for that. Not that we want them disconnected anyway, Paypal is cooperating just fine, you just need to use the proper reporting channels with them.

Be realistic - VISA will simply trash your report, they're not going to bother with it. To get their attention we need a TON of DMCAs to show the consistent pattern of infringements and on top of it a follow up from AK. Otherwise it's simply a waste of time. There are only two types of cases where DMCAing VISA is appropriate:

1. If a file locker is using their own merchant account.
2. If a file locker is using a rogue billing company which will not disconnect them no matter the amount of DMCAs they get from rights holders.

DMCAs should be sent strategically, with the aim to disconnect a file locker on the ground of repeat copyright infringement. Or to terminate a rogue billing company. You send them where the chances of termination are the best at the moment - when a file locker is using Paypal, Paypal is your best chance. Paypal is NOT rogue billing company (at least not copyright infringement wise), they WILL terminate a file locker if they get enough DMCAs - but, of course, the bigger the site, the more DMCAs they need. For Rapidshare, obviously, they still need more.

Only when Rapidshare's Paypal account is killed, and when they will switch to processing through their own merchant account, only then DMCAing VISA will become somewhat of a realistic possibility.

You may DMCA VISA of course for Rapidshare links if that is your choice, however you're not going to put even a dent in Rapidshare if you do that. But, if you'll send your DMCA to Paypal, you'll add them one more strike on file and bring them one more small step toward termination. Of course termination by Paypal is not the final death of a file locker, especially when it is big like Rapidshare. But it's a step.

Don't let your personal grudges with Paypal stand in the way of killing off file lockers. DMCA Paypal, cc to Copycontrol, and let AK handle reports to all other 3rd parties including VISA. That approach works best in the long term.

Nautilus 11-02-2012 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpint (Post 19291541)
Why dont you want DMCA's sent to Visa ? Thats where I would send it if it were me dealing with RapidShare Once they loose Visa they would be pretty much fucked

They will not lose VISA when they're still using Paypal as a 3rd party payments processor. VISA will not nuke Paypal only to have Rapidshare account killed. They can do that for some smaller rogue billing company, but obviously not for Paypal. In theory, they can tell Paypal to drop Rapidshare, but in practice it is highly unlikely that they're going to interfere with Paypal over that issue at all. And that is absolutely not necessary - Paypal is not rogue billing company, they do have repeat infringer policy and do terminate file lockers. Unless you've been living in a cave for the past 4 or so months, you'd have known that by now. But they need DMCAs to trigger their repeat offender policy. The bigger the site, the more DMCAs they need.

dgraves 11-02-2012 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nautilus (Post 19291646)
I understand your frustration, however, here is the reality - DMCAing VISA for hosts that are using Paypal is pointless. VISA is not going to disconnect Paypal because of your DMCA, or because of a million of DMCAs for that matter, they're too big for that. Not that we want them disconnected anyway, Paypal is cooperating just fine, you just need to use the proper reporting channels with them.

Be realistic - VISA will simply trash your report, they're not going to bother with it. To get their attention we need a TON of DMCAs to show the consistent pattern of infringements and on top of it a follow up from AK. Otherwise it's simply a waste of time. There are only two types of cases where DMCAing VISA is appropriate:

1. If a file locker is using their own merchant account.
2. If a file locker is using a rogue billing company which will not disconnect them no matter the amount of DMCAs they get from rights holders.

DMCAs should be sent strategically, with the aim to disconnect a file locker on the ground of repeat copyright infringement. Or to terminate a rogue billing company. You send them where the chances of termination are the best at the moment - when a file locker is using Paypal, Paypal is your best chance. Paypal is NOT rogue billing company (at least not copyright infringement wise), they WILL terminate a file locker if they get enough DMCAs - but, of course, the bigger the site, the more DMCAs they need. For Rapidshare, obviously, they still need more.

Only when Rapidshare's Paypal account is killed, and when they will switch to processing through their own merchant account, only then DMCAing VISA will become somewhat of a realistic possibility.

You may DMCA VISA of course for Rapidshare links if that is your choice, however you're not going to put even a dent in Rapidshare if you do that. But, if you'll send your DMCA to Paypal, you'll add them one more strike on file and bring them one more small step toward termination. Of course termination by Paypal is not the final death of a file locker, especially when it is big like Rapidshare. But it's a step.

Don't let your personal grudges with Paypal stand in the way of killing off file lockers. DMCA Paypal, cc to Copycontrol, and let AK handle reports to all other 3rd parties including VISA. That approach works best in the long term.

There's no extra work adding them to the cc field but I get where you're coming from.

It seems to me that an army of people sending in DMCA's would be more effective than all coming from one source. It's kind of like getting many complaints from one customer as opposed to getting that same complaint from many customers.

It might be David against Goliath but at least it's some action and that's better than no action.

I think we need to hire some gays to help out with this fight. They seem to be pretty good at it.

AdultKing 11-02-2012 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dgraves (Post 19291559)
I cc'd PayPal on a DMCA that I sent out and a few days later I got a reply letting me know my accounts have been "Limited" which basically means I couldn't use them. They didn't give me a specific reason, just a list of a million possibilities for the "Limit".

I find this odd, Paypal does not do business like this, there must be some other reason for your limitation. Paypal take infringement reports seriously however in some cases there needs to be a significant number of them for Paypal to take action.



Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpint (Post 19291541)
Why dont you want DMCA's sent to Visa ? Thats where I would send it if it were me dealing with RapidShare Once they loose Visa they would be pretty much fucked

You can send DMCA's to Visa however it's important to cc them to [email protected] as we are able to present a much better and broader case to them with a significant database of infringement.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RegUser (Post 19291079)
Wjat is there left to save?
The 1000s of tube sites are full of millions of free videos with thousands of frsh videos being added every day.
Piracy is not only alive but thriving

When we get enough funding to expand this effort we shall expand this effort, for now we're concentrating on File Lockers.


Quote:

Originally Posted by vollenweider (Post 19291234)
Hello AdultKing,
I am Simon, we have had few conversation over icq but its been for a while since last time i saw you online so i bet i am on your shit list. Since this is a public forum, i would like to state what i had discussed with you previously regarding piracy.

No you're not on my shitlist. I am rarely on ICQ and do not have time to speak to every person individually, especially over recent times where I have been travelling.


Quote:

I remember you saying the main goal of your project is to fight against piracy, and you have targeted the file lockers first for your reasons which i don't even care about. Reading some of the comments in this topic makes me believe that your job is effective while some of them aren't that much clear. If you remember, my question was that why don't you go after torrent sites at the same time since they are worse than file hosting sites offering FREE access to all the materials. A simple example is the following website:
As I have explained to you countless times, we are working on file lockers, we do not have the resources yet to expand this effort, if you want to contribute the resources to provide the manpower and legal backup required to expand this effort then read this post here for how you can help.


Quote:

So lets go back to the original question, do you believe only file lockers are the headache and responsible for piracy or should we take a look at torrents too?
As of today there is $862.80 in our current account and $2310.00 in our business payments account. On Monday an Invoice for $2036.41 falls due. We have legal fees falling due next week also.

My question to you is, what are you doing to help us keep going ?

Our resources are extremely limited, we cannot expand beyond what we're doing until we have more resources.

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyloadproductions (Post 19291374)
Rapidshare seems to let several things linger on their servers for a very long time.

We're steadily building a case against RapidShare, these things take time however.

dgraves 11-02-2012 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 19291762)
I find this odd, Paypal does not do business like this, there must be some other reason for your limitation. Paypal take infringement reports seriously however in some cases there needs to be a significant number of them for Paypal to take action.

I didn't expect that either but it was a pain in the ass to get it opened again.

Paul Markham 11-03-2012 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dgraves (Post 19291781)
I didn't expect that either but it was a pain in the ass to get it opened again.

Telling Paypal someone is stealing your porn content, isn't the wisest thing to do.

Sorry to criticise you but it's kind of like saying "I use Paypal to process porn"

AdultKing 11-03-2012 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 19292159)
Telling Paypal someone is stealing your porn content, isn't the wisest thing to do.

Sorry to criticise you but it's kind of like saying "I use Paypal to process porn"

No, it's not.

Paypal deal with these matters professionally. If people get their accounts limited there is usually a good reason, if there isn't then there are processes in place to appeal the decision.

Paul Markham 11-03-2012 04:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 19292166)
No, it's not.

Paypal deal with these matters professionally. If people get their accounts limited there is usually a good reason, if there isn't then there are processes in place to appeal the decision.

So we can send them a DMCA linking our our email we use on Paypal to our porn. :thumbsup

I'm saying be bloody careful how you DMCA them.

AdultKing 11-03-2012 04:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 19292183)
So we can send them a DMCA linking our our email we use on Paypal to our porn. :thumbsup

I'm saying be bloody careful how you DMCA them.

One of the things I find annoying about this project is the large amount of misinformation people spread which is based on hearsay and urban legend.

Firstly, there is ABSOLUTELY NO DANGER in providing Paypal an infringement report of any legal content, porn or otherwise. Accounts are limited for a reason and I know for a fact that Paypal will not go limiting peoples accounts because they file an IR process report.

Secondly, anyone sending DMCA notices to Paypal should STOP doing so.

Paypal have a clearly established Infringement Report process. It is necessary to follow that process to have an infringement recorded and acted upon by Paypal.

You can get a copy of the Paypal IR process form here:

http://copycontrol.org/forms/paypali...mentreport.pdf

Sending this form with any attachments necesssary is the ONLY way to file reports with Paypal.

I would like to remind people how important it is to copy DMCA and Infringement reports to [email protected] - many more people complain about piracy here than actually bother to do this.

vollenweider 11-03-2012 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 19291762)
My question to you is, what are you doing to help us keep going ?

Ok as i said before, i am particularly interested in torrents. I can't believe that piracy stops/slows down with your file lockers project therefore i would help and donate as soon as i see that your interest is PIRACY in general and not file lockers/hosters.

If you are sure about your methodologies and are indeed effective, please show me that you can go against at least rarbg.com and stop them from publishing all those materials and i will make sure to support your project whether its called "stop file lockers" or "pimp my ride".

Waiting to see your comments on this.
Thanks

johnnyloadproductions 11-03-2012 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vollenweider (Post 19292388)
Ok as i said before, i am particularly interested in torrents. I can't believe that piracy stops/slows down with your file lockers project therefore i would help and donate as soon as i see that your interest is PIRACY in general and not file lockers/hosters.

If you are sure about your methodologies and are indeed effective, please show me that you can go against at least rarbg.com and stop them from publishing all those materials and i will make sure to support your project whether its called "stop file lockers" or "pimp my ride".

Waiting to see your comments on this.
Thanks

Considering that I'm quoting you at your post count of 2 with your radical opinion, you essentially have 0 credibility or value in what you think.

I'm fairly certain you're just another upload monkey coming over here to cause trouble or just using another nick and have an agenda. Why else would you start posting in here with your first post counts?

6South 11-03-2012 08:43 AM

A high post count really doesn't impress me or tell me what a great person / professional someone is. It tells me they spend a shitload of time on a forum, basically.

I'll try to summarize the entire problem w/ the current approach to content protection / anti piracy w/ a simple analogy. It's not perfect but that's why it's called an analogy instead of an example...

The current approach by content producers / owners to fighting piracy is the equivalent of a bank that stores all its money in the parking lot.

Then, when people come by and steal it they say the solution is to try and make stealing "more illegal".

While it's working out great for certain business models on both sides of the issue and helping people who want to further a "police state" / "1984" society in the long term it's doomed to fail.

johnnyloadproductions 11-03-2012 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6South (Post 19292413)
A high post count really doesn't impress me or tell me what a great person / professional someone is. It tells me they spend a shitload of time on a forum, basically.

I'll try to summarize the entire problem w/ the current approach to content protection / anti piracy w/ a simple analogy. It's not perfect but that's why it's called an analogy instead of an example...

The current approach by content producers / owners to fighting piracy is the equivalent of a bank that stores all its money in the parking lot.

Then, when people come by and steal it they say the solution is to try and make stealing "more illegal".

While it's working out great for certain business models on both sides of the issue and helping people who want to further a "police state" / "1984" society in the long term it's doomed to fail.

It's easy to bitch, doing something requires an order of magnitude more of effort.
Why are you wasting your small amount of post counts on such a cause you deem worthless? Sounds like you have priority issues, either that or this is a fake nick you proxy into (makes you a coward).

MakingItPay 11-03-2012 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6South (Post 19292413)
A high post count really doesn't impress me or tell me what a great person / professional someone is. It tells me they spend a shitload of time on a forum, basically.

I'll try to summarize the entire problem w/ the current approach to content protection / anti piracy w/ a simple analogy. It's not perfect but that's why it's called an analogy instead of an example...

The current approach by content producers / owners to fighting piracy is the equivalent of a bank that stores all its money in the parking lot.

Then, when people come by and steal it they say the solution is to try and make stealing "more illegal".

While it's working out great for certain business models on both sides of the issue and helping people who want to further a "police state" / "1984" society in the long term it's doomed to fail.

I am not sure I see the analogy. More illegal is not what we want. We want enforcement of existing laws against stealing and profiting from our work. We want businesses like Visa, Paypal, and others to stop turning a blind eye to this theft. It seems as thought with AK's work, this is beginning to happen. I like the idea of DRM that stops theft including monitor recording. I would buy that all day long! If someone steals my work, posts it on youtube, I DMCA it, youtube tells the thief who I am, but doesn't tell me who he is. It is backwards, and we need to turn it around IMO.

AdultKing 11-03-2012 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vollenweider (Post 19292388)
Ok as i said before, i am particularly interested in torrents. I can't believe that piracy stops/slows down with your file lockers project therefore i would help and donate as soon as i see that your interest is PIRACY in general and not file lockers/hosters.

You're a broken record.

Our current project is Stop File Lockers, that's what we're working on.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6South (Post 19292413)
The current approach by content producers / owners to fighting piracy is the equivalent of a bank that stores all its money in the parking lot.

Then, when people come by and steal it they say the solution is to try and make stealing "more illegal".

While it's working out great for certain business models on both sides of the issue and helping people who want to further a "police state" / "1984" society in the long term it's doomed to fail.

Ah yes, these are all chestnuts of the pro-piracy camp. Simple fact is in law I can leave my front and back door open, it's still illegal for you to come inside and take my TV.

Nobody is making anything "more illegal" they're just now proactively enforcing the law.

As for post counts, the low post count pro piracy sympathisers who have posted in this thread all have a characteristic that you share.

notinmybackyard 11-03-2012 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6South (Post 19292413)
While it's working out great for certain business models on both sides of the issue and helping people who want to further a "police state" / "1984" society in the long term it's doomed to fail.

First of all let me say that I have a low post count, I am recent to this forum, english is not my first language and I am a nobody... And I do not expect to be treated as anything else other than a nobody. If there is a possiblity of doing business and making money then I will take off my nobody hat and put on my sombody hat but not before that moment presents itself. I ask for nothing and I seek nothing

// political tirad on

This lie about a "police state" gets brought up every single time anyone tries to tackle piracy. Google funds millions porpogating this myth because searches for pirated content is almost 40% of their traffic (source forbes)

Youtube (google) propogates the myth because let us face it. No one is interested at all in some idiot's vacation videos. It is the films, television shows and music videos that keep people visiting youtube. ((( And if anyone believes the myth of viral videos understand that it is just "google directed" traffic. It works like a lottery, if someone youtube employee likes your video, he sends it a lot of traffic)))

Facebook propogates it because stolen content is also part of their business model. Let us face it, unless it is a photo of someone young girl posting flirty pictures... Facebook becomes really flat. Therefore they need photos, etc made by professionals and posted by so called « fans » or « lovers » of the image in order to keep people coming back. Again no one is interested in someone's vacation to disney world.

Pinterest... linkedin... etc etc. Their entire business model is other people's hard work and content. Therefore the moment anyone threatens that model they rile up the « no-life-always-on-line-junkies » and tell them their freedom is threaten.

And it is complete bullshit !!!

Freedom existed before the Internet AND IN FACT it seems to me there was a hell of a lot more freedom going around before all this crazyness started.

I will tell you what is killing freedom.

1) It is the « fact-fuck-no-life » that sits on Facebook 24 hours a day searching for a pice of ass or a free cyber jerk off session that gets bored and starts downloading films to pass his time between pokes. If he just got off his fat ass and went to a park and said « hello » to a girl, he would loose weight and probably end up doing something other than his hand. This « fat-fuck-no-life » does nothing online worth protecting and he will not get off his dumb ass unless it is to protect his source of free downloads. And the « no-life-internet-junkie » is mega dumb! For exemple look at the Occupy mouvement, a bunch of Internet-junkies that took over parks and started blogging and trying to Facebook like social change and end gouvernement corruption.

2) Big United States corporation are kiling freedom. (Sorry for any anti-americain sentement that may be expressed.. I am not doing it on purpose).

* Look at Apple, they use slave labour in China to build the « no-life's dream » of a a Star Trek future. Giving up what little money they have and killing jobs and the local economy
*Look at Google and how they are seeking to control the flow of all information and dialog in the world. (just look at the people crying over their website's ranks if you think I am wrong on this)
* Look at the corporation of the Department of Defense (D.O.D) that invented GPS. You can not go anywhere in the world now without them knowing where you are if you have one of these devices.

I could make a list that spans pages but each time you see the same formula over and over again. It is a version of George Orwell's 1984 being played out. Ignorance is strength.. Strength that flows from the dummies for the gouvernements and the corporations. So since you are concerned about freedom.. I will tell you how to stop the police state from happening.

Just switch off the consumer electronics.

Learn to read a map... Learn to talk to someone face to face... learn how to get laid without using your own hand and a tube site.

Because freedom is stepping out into the sunshine and ignoring the monsters trying to distract you from getting a tan.

// Political tirad off

In the mean time the « no-life-internet-junkies » threaten my honest business model based on hard work, skill and respect. You should learn that freedom is not something that can be downloaded. However hardwork, skill and respect for yourself and others are the allies of freedom and in abudance in a free society. Therefore I support all and any efforts to stop them. Including Adult King's file locker efforts.

DWB 11-03-2012 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vollenweider (Post 19292388)
Ok as i said before, i am particularly interested in torrents. I can't believe that piracy stops/slows down with your file lockers project therefore i would help and donate as soon as i see that your interest is PIRACY in general and not file lockers/hosters.

If you are sure about your methodologies and are indeed effective, please show me that you can go against at least rarbg.com and stop them from publishing all those materials and i will make sure to support your project whether its called "stop file lockers" or "pimp my ride".

Waiting to see your comments on this.
Thanks

Oh great, another one. :1orglaugh

dgraves 11-03-2012 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 19292159)
Telling Paypal someone is stealing your porn content, isn't the wisest thing to do.

Sorry to criticise you but it's kind of like saying "I use Paypal to process porn"

It seems like I was guilty by association. Nothing else happened to provoke that and they couldn't give me a solid reason why they put a limit on my account.

Anyway, it's not a big deal because we resolved the issue. I just don't want to send them DMCA's because I need that account to pay for stuff like site design work.

AdultKing 11-03-2012 10:49 AM

After months of discussions and ongoing pressure including the risk to Avangate of losing relationships important to it's ongoing business we saw Avangate finally remove payment processing from a large batch of file hosts. However the process is not complete and we shall be placing Avangate under pressure to drop all IP infringing merchants.

http://stopfilelockers.com/avangate-...nt-processing/

18 Sites have lost payment processing through Avangate, more will follow.

Bitshare.com
Cepzo.com
Extabit.com
Filefactory.com
Filefolks.com
Filerio.in
Filestay.com
Freakshare.com
Luckyshare.net
Lumfile.com
Megaload.it
Novafile.com
Oteupload.com
Prefiles.com
Ryushare.com
Sharedbit.net
Upfile.biz
Upsto.re

Thanks to the whole Copy Control team for the months of hard work on this issue.

Tjeezers 11-03-2012 10:53 AM

Someone clicked my sig, it`s not fair!!

SKUP 11-03-2012 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 19292562)
After months of discussions and ongoing pressure including the risk to Avangate of losing relationships important to it's ongoing business we saw Avangate finally remove payment processing from a large batch of file hosts. However the process is not complete and we shall be placing Avangate under pressure to drop all IP infringing merchants.

http://stopfilelockers.com/avangate-...nt-processing/

18 Sites have lost payment processing through Avangate, more will follow.

Bitshare.com
Cepzo.com
Extabit.com
Filefactory.com
Filefolks.com
Filerio.in
Filestay.com
Freakshare.com
Luckyshare.net
Lumfile.com
Megaload.it
Novafile.com
Oteupload.com
Prefiles.com
Ryushare.com
Sharedbit.net
Upfile.biz
Upsto.re

Thanks to the whole Copy Control team for the months of hard work on this issue.

WOW, cool, congrats. :upsidedow

DWB 11-03-2012 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 19292562)
After months of discussions and ongoing pressure including the risk to Avangate of losing relationships important to it's ongoing business we saw Avangate finally remove payment processing from a large batch of file hosts. However the process is not complete and we shall be placing Avangate under pressure to drop all IP infringing merchants.

http://stopfilelockers.com/avangate-...nt-processing/

18 Sites have lost payment processing through Avangate, more will follow.

Bitshare.com
Cepzo.com
Extabit.com
Filefactory.com
Filefolks.com
Filerio.in
Filestay.com
Freakshare.com
Luckyshare.net
Lumfile.com
Megaload.it
Novafile.com
Oteupload.com
Prefiles.com
Ryushare.com
Sharedbit.net
Upfile.biz
Upsto.re

Thanks to the whole Copy Control team for the months of hard work on this issue.

Fantastic news!!!

Nautilus 11-03-2012 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 19292562)
After months of discussions and ongoing pressure including the risk to Avangate of losing relationships important to it's ongoing business we saw Avangate finally remove payment processing from a large batch of file hosts. However the process is not complete and we shall be placing Avangate under pressure to drop all IP infringing merchants.

http://stopfilelockers.com/avangate-...nt-processing/

Great statement :thumbsup


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc