![]() |
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
How do they taste? Hope my pubes are not getting caught in your mouth. |
Quote:
Regardless, contributions to this effort have fallen well short of meeting the costs of it, I've already posted a very detailed account of where our costs lay, if you're really interested go back in the thread and read it. |
Quote:
People who actually own intellectual property do not have any problems with AK, what he is doing, or how he is funded. That is a fact. Upload monkeys, tube owners, and other pirates... well, it is clear why so many of you are concerned. But don't worry, you'll all get your day. It's coming. And Manwin is probably going to help fund your demise. :1orglaugh |
Quote:
Next is the affiliate program. File lockers offer more incentive for people to spread links with clearly defined titles, tags, and explanation of what the content is vs a tube site which has "Blonde chick taking it in the Ass". Also, the scope of file lockers is much larger. With file lockers you can pirate anything. With tube sites it is limited to video content. The ability to pirate different content doesn't mean that the download of that content surpasses a tube site which gets millions of hits per day. When you take the above in to consideration along with the fact you've been focusing on File lockers, that would explain why more DMCA notices get noticed with file lockers than they do with tube sites. Come on, You can't really be this stupid to ignore what is clearly visible, unless, of course, you are in the pockets of well known piracy tube sites. How much is manwin paying you to divert attention away from tube sites? |
Quote:
if so your clueless. :1orglaugh |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Do you really think that companies like Remove Your Content, Degban, Take Down Piracy and so on are just missing all the content you say is being pirated on tubes ? The fact is they all report piracy on tubes, just not to the same extent as they report to Google on file lockers, torrent sites, forums and so on. I am not saying tubes aren't an issue, what I am saying is that they were the wrong first priority for an anti piracy effort to start with. We chose file lockers, it was the right choice. Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
the length people will go, and the justifications they have, just to watch some porn for free is amazing.
|
Quote:
However, since you know the facts, please enlighten us all and show us which ones and I'll go out of my way to gather the proper evidence so that AK can hit them with everything he has. Of course we both know you can't and won't, so I'm not even sure why I asked. But thanks for getting on the DWB deez nutz train with the rest of the anonymous trolls. If you can round up a few more we can do the choo-choo. All aboard!!!!! Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/xvideos.com <- ranked 50th in the world. http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/rapidshare.com <-- Ranked 212th in the the world. Which do you think has more of a global reach? The numbers don't lie. Does xvideos have SOME licensed content? Possibly. Are all 2.4 million scenes licensed? Highly doubtful. I would venture to say that you could add up all the traffic from those 600 sites and they probably still wouldn't come close to what a single well known tube site does. Furthermore, tube sites are about one single thing. Free porn. File lockers and the rest of the list you you cited deal in more than that. I would think that they're bigger in the 'warez' scene than in the porn, though, everyone has their speciality. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You should get a nice fat 'donation' from manwin for your diversion tactics! :) |
Quote:
There are five file lockers much bigger in traffic than RapidShare. Quote:
However let's play along with your viewpoint, what would you do about all of this ? I've asked you how you would go about an anti piracy effort, I've asked you what you would do that we aren't doing, you won't answer. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Ok notjoe, it's put up or shut up time. What would you be doing ? We have limited resources and a huge problem to work on. How would you do it ? |
AK, when you started your campaign and were doing it on your own dime and effort I had no questions whatsoever. Yeah, I didn't like it and don't think this is a solution to a problem, but at least you were clear, and everything was straightforward. But when I saw that you've targeted PayPal accounts of various hosts but excluded Crocko and Hotfile and then you turned this into a money making enterprise and started to aggressively advertise it, questions sure popped up right away and I think (and I don't think I'm alone) since you are taking money from content producers and having them sign their rights to you, you should be able to clearly respond to those.
Let me do this in orderly fashion: 1. FilePost. This is what you've said before: gfy.com/showpost.php?p=19052337&postcount=1176 So, what is the update on this? All I can see is that Filepost is operating exactly as they were. They have a hidden affiliate program which is an elegant solution previously employed by late FileSonic (ownership? ties?), here: filepost.com/blog/post/82/ Did you advice them to present it like this? Your negotiations with them, what was the result? It didn't take me long to find one: porn-w.org/topic4975004.html Comment? 2. Crocko. You said that you are going to fight hosts with affiliate programs especially aggressively. You keep saying that "Crocko is in the works" yet somehow it is hard to believe. I just can't believe that a much larger host like Depositfiles lost their PayPal and Crocko still stands? This either proves that you either can't do shit to no one unless other parties want it or that you are being paid off by Crocko to leave them alone or even help them. 3. Hotfile. You keep saying that Hotfile is in front of courts and there is no point in chasing them? What a load of crap. Hotfile was created by ex Tube8 owner (we know who owns it now), Hotfile started this whole thing you are fighting against. They have PayPal and an open affiliate program. So what is they are facing legal woes? They are making truckloads of money to pay for top attorneys. Why not cut their PayPal and let them die in court? You can talk tough all you want and certain people may carry you and your high horse in the light of fame but all the big players are still around, working as usual (may be with little issues) and some are doing BETTER than ever. |
Hey freakfiles...why don't YOU do something to stop piracy? Let me know how it goes! We're all waiting for you and notjoe to get to work. :)
|
Great thread !
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We will find out about his real motives sooner or later. |
Quote:
To make the long story short, what AK is doing doesn't affect piracy, nothing has changed since June, i know you are going to say you have terminated xxxx of file lockers blah blah but the pirate is still able to download and distribute our stuff on torrents for free!! Last month you said you guyz made some progress to fight against torrents, but nothing yet. Oh one more thing, Where are the domain seizings ? didn't you said its not that difficult for you and i shouldn't bet on this? I started to believe that you don't give a fuck about piracy in gerneral. Don't say that what can i do!! since you are accepting "donations" from manwin you should fight against all kind of piracy UNLESS you contract for accepting donations from manwin was signed otherwise hehe Thanks |
Quote:
Quote:
Really think about that for a moment before you answer. This isn't like cross sales where it could have an impact on your business, and you had/have every right to flip out about those, as it affected YOU and other honest people in the business. But piracy... why do you or anyone else care what rights holders are doing and the attitude and tactics they have to use to get the job done IF it is not affecting you? Why do you care what methods are used, who supports it, and how it has to be done if you're not involved? I'm not trying to jump all over, I'm just trying to logically explain why it doesn't make sense for ANYONE to worry about what AK is doing unless they are directly affected. That means either you are trolling, hating, or supporting piracy. Otherwise you wouldn't care enough to keep coming into this thread and posting negative comments or questing the motives of someone who does not affect you in any way, shape or form. So which is it? I don't believe you support piracy, so are you just hating or trolling? So you don't like his attitude, that's great, why do you care if his attitude does not affect your business? Would you prefer a push-over bro who can be bought to look over certain sites and make back room deals? Because that is what you would get. AK needs to be firm and just, and if that means he comes off as having a bad attitude towards those of you who are not even involved with what he is doing, then again, WHY DO YOU CARE? Trolling, hating, or supporting piracy. It comes down to one of those three for each and every one of you who are busting his balls. At least with you and that ass hat with the feeds in his sig, people know who you are. Everyone else can kick rocks. Quote:
1) Tubes are VERY manageable. 2) Tubes quickly reply to DMCA notices. Many of them now give producers take down access so no DMCA has to be sent. Instant removals. 3) Most smaller tubes scrape the larger tubes so as you remove the video from the large tube it kills the video across countless smaller ones. 4) Most of the larger tube sites are licensing content and have 10s of 1000s of legal scenes already, not to mention legal scenes uploaded by the content owners. 5) There are already multiple companies who are sending DMCAs to tube sites on behalf of content owners. YES more eyes are on tubes, but many of them are moving quickly to be more legit as they see the writing on the wall. If you want to argue about which is worse for FREE PORN, tubes or lockers, tubes would win that argument hands down. But that is not the debate. The debate is about PIRACY, and currently file lockers DWARF tubes for piracy (illegal content) and it is a hell of a lot more difficult to deal with permanent content removal on a locker. Last, you are free, just like everyone else is, to start your own movement or company to go after whoever you see fit, by whatever rules you want to play by. No one is stopping you. Quote:
AK now has support from a lot of large companies, I don't think anyone is worried about what you are the other naysayers in this thread have to say, especially since you're not even involved. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Personally, I don't care even if Manwin paid him to kill all of their competition. Like I said before, I'd rather deal with one Manwin than one thousand of you idiots who try to skirt the law every chance you get and hide behind offshore hosting accounts who ignore DMCA requests. It boggles my mind how shallow and short minded some of you are. It is no wonder most people are failing at online businesses and at life in general. If you had something proud to represent and were successful, you wouldn't have to hide behind a fake nick all the time or you would at least let people know who you are. It may just have a little more impact than posting like a scared bitch. |
That's good for you! If you really see changes then i am happy, but i guess this is what someone says when having "stop file lockers" written on HER signature.
Anyway i give no fuck about your file locker shits, i was just trying to open up your eyes so you can go after torrents sites since you guyz are working against piracy. The irony is that AK has mentioned that anyone who derives profits from online piracy will be directly dealt with, so what are you getting from manwin isn't derived from piracy ? You need to clarify some facts so we can decide whether or not you are working against piracy, or you are working for pirates to work against piracy :) |
Quote:
Do YOU have skin in the game? And does whatever conclusion you may or may not come to matter to anybody? |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But since you want to talk about their piracy side, if anyone should be giving back to fight piracy, it should be them. They have profited plenty from piracy so it is fair and fitting they use some of that money and fight piracy, even if it is ironic. However, this is the same company who paid for a huge building size ad in New York city promoting condom use, then spent God knows how much money recently in LA to fight the condom law. Hypocrisy is their middle name. No one should really be surprised. Quote:
|
Quote:
We also have people who have contributed time and money voluntarily. There is a core group of people working behind the scenes, around the clock, shutting down piracy and every week Nautilus posts more sites terminated or completely offline as a result. Why should I bear the entire cost of shutting down the piracy problem affecting rights holders ? Quote:
We are not making money, we set fees for represented rights holders to help us recover costs but we're a long way from recovering the costs of this campaign. I have contributed more than anyone to this project and you have no right to question anything as you are not a contributor and you are not in our constituency. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Let me make this patently clear. Right at this moment we are going after file lockers, we have just started going after forums, then we will move on to torrent trackers, blogs, tubes and other forms of commercial piracy. Quote:
You people can sit on the sidelines booing our efforts all you like, it's not going to stop what we are doing and just makes me more determined to crush commercial piracy where-ever we can. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But I guess for those who still live at home with their mom or don't actually own content in the first place, even $1 is too much. |
stop feeding the trolls. silence will annoy even more.
|
Quote:
Let's see what you have to say!! ----------------- Oh and btw i am not asking you to stop what you are doing, i am asking you to do what you say in the public, fight against piracy (torrents, usenet, tubes, fileshiters )and not fight against file lockers which are competitors or whatever people here say about tube and shits! |
Quote:
|
Adultking, when are you gonna take thepiratebay down?
|
Quote:
Were you all dropped on your heads as kids or something? 80 pages of and a few months "Killing Off File Lockers" and you dummies are still crying about piracy other than file lockers. AK has already said probably no less than 100 times that there is a long term plan but right now the focus is file lockers. Read that a few million times until it sinks in. I don't know what language you speak as your first language, but in English "file locker" does not mean "torrent" or "tube." It means "file locker." No wonder so many of you hide behind anonymous nicks. You are, as Franck likes to say, "imbeciles" with kindergarten level reading skills. That said, troll on! Your posts are at least entertaining and it keeps bumping the thread, which in turns brings more pirate shit stain haters, who in turn keep bumping the thread and keeping us all entertained. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Their dissent, for whatever reason has kept the thread alive. |
Quote:
|
Hindu's in motion
New sites, There are two new porn forums softcore-sharing.com/ hd4porno.com/ |
AK I'm not so sure it's worth while arguing with the trolls. Isn't your time and effort better focused elsewhere?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And I find this "trolling" very informative.:upsidedow |
Quote:
If your content is indeed being pirated then I would think you'd take any steps necessary to try to mitigate that. Email [email protected] and we'll get you set up. |
Quote:
So what do we get here, you're claiming that for money, you will start killing a site, any site. When asked about your ideological enemies such as Crocko and Hotfile (who should be easy enough for you to "kill") you come up with the biggest pile of horse shit world has ever seen like "... current target of operations and we don't discuss operational matters." I mean WTF does that mean? Any question gets ignored, any person doubting you gets labeled a "pirate". Simple logic that tubes are the real problem for this industry (Tube8 at one time was almost number 1 in Alexa) is rejected by you. You are nothing but a paid whore. Who's your John be it Manwin or other tube owners doesn't really matter. You haven't done shit (600 hosts that don't even pop up in alexa don't count), you can't do shit apart from shooting emails to payment providers and if by any chance (highly unlikely) you are who you say you are you will fail and stop doing this as this venue is pointless and it is not a solution. Your representation is bullshit as well, all you can really do with that is yet again shoot some emails all over the place on their behalf and that's it. Check out what your fellow countrymen have to say: youtube.com/watch?v=yoPxT4Be56c In half a year, I'll come back to this thread and all the major players will be out there and I would be curious to see what you'll have to say then. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:02 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc